Shop

Boston Medrano v Marshall Electrical Contracting Inc MEMO DiscussionSchool

Description

Boston Medrano v Marshall Electrical Contracting Inc MEMO DiscussionSchool

Boston University

Question Description

Immar Medrano was employed as a journeyman electrician by Marshall Electrical Contracting, Inc. (MEC), in Marshall, Missouri. Medrano attended an electrician apprenticeship night class at a community college in Sedalia, Missouri. MEC paid Medrano’s tuition and book fees. Attendance at the course required Medrano to drive 70 miles roundtrip. One night, when Medrano was driving home from the class, a drunk driver crossed the centerline of U.S. Highway 65 and collided head-on with Medrano’s automobile. Medrano died in the accident. His wife and two children filed a workers’ compensation claim for death benefits against MEC. Are Medrano’s actions at the time of the automobile accident within the course and scope of his employment, thus entitling his heirs to workers’ compensation benefits? Medrano v. Marshall Electrical Contracting Inc., 173 S.W.3d 333, 2005 Mo. App. Lexis 1088 (Court of Appeals of Missouri, 2005)

Please follow the instruction and examples

  Do you need high-quality Custom Essay Writing Services?  

Order now

Reviews (0)

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Be the first to review “Boston Medrano v Marshall Electrical Contracting Inc MEMO DiscussionSchool”

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *